This 'right' for gays is an injustice to children

[Scott L. Martinez]

I really dont see a problem with a child being raised by gay parents. Some children have no parents and are orphaned.

But your justifying your point based on a bad situation!
That's not very smart!
You could justify putting kids in the care of child molesters using you logic!

If you go through life with your head in the sand...all you end up being is an arse.

If you actually were intelligent, you'd realise your argument (if you can call it that) is a lot of rubbish - and shut the hell up. People need proof nowadays, it's not the middle ages. If you make a claim you must support it with reliable evidence, otherwise you will crash and burn.

And you have, frequently.

I look forward to gunning you down in flames again.

[Guest]

I really dont see a problem with a child being raised by gay parents. Some children have no parents and are orphaned.

But your justifying your point based on a bad situation!
That's not very smart!
You could justify putting kids in the care of child molesters using you logic!

If you go through life with your head in the sand...all you end up being is an arse.

If you actually were intelligent, you'd realise your argument (if you can call it that) is a lot of rubbish - and shut the hell up. People need proof nowadays, it's not the middle ages. If you make a claim you must support it with reliable evidence, otherwise you will crash and burn.

And you have, frequently.

I look forward to gunning you down in flames again.

The only thing FLAMING is you!
Flaming queer that is!

[Guest]

I really dont see a problem with a child being raised by gay parents. Some children have no parents and are orphaned. This thread is laughable, but soon there wont be room for free speech, which means threads like this wont exist, which will be more laughable (If were still allowed to laugh by this point)

Free speech isn't available everywhere or to everyone as it is now. Try being a woman in Muslim countries. Think for a second that you will speak out against the chinese government in Beijing...see what happens. Hell, at the moment, try approaching one of your elected leaders in the USA as Sheryl Crow did with Georgey's little sidekick, Rove and see what happens.

I am curious, Kalel. Are you more against homosexuality, or homosexual men? Do you watch porn at all? If so, what is your reaction to lesbian sex? Do you fast forward, or watch it through? Just curious.

I'm a red blooded American.
I like women
Twice the women twice the fun!

But then again the porn made with women on women are hot looking babes!
Ever seen the real dyke on dyke movies?
UGHH.
You can keep em! ROTFLMAO

To a point, I can agree that what goes on between two adults is thier business BEHIND CLOSED DOORS!

But that's not the case today is it?
They want PERFECT EQUALITY and HATE LAWS that would make reading from the Bible a crime!'
They want to be considrered as equals to heterosexual couples in regards to adoption!
When that's NOT in the best interest of society and the child!
They want to donate blood regardless of sexual orientation and not based on the fact that 80% of new HIV cases are themselves!

[Guest]

I really dont see a problem with a child being raised by gay parents. Some children have no parents and are orphaned.

But your justifying your point based on a bad situation!
That's not very smart!
You could justify putting kids in the care of child molesters using you logic!

If you go through life with your head in the sand...all you end up being is an arse.

If you actually were intelligent, you'd realise your argument (if you can call it that) is a lot of rubbish - and shut the hell up. People need proof nowadays, it's not the middle ages. If you make a claim you must support it with reliable evidence, otherwise you will crash and burn.

So, smart boy... point out where I was wrong to say that their arguement was NOT based on bad situations?

[Scott L. Martinez]

You never learn do you.

Have you nothing better to do?

If this is what torments you so much then you have a F****** sad life!

[Guest]

I look forward to gunning you down in flames again.

You flamed yourself by not stepping up to the plate and answering!

Poof!

[Guest]

you're all talking s hit

[THAT_GUEST]

you're all talking s hit

This is a politics thread!

[Guest]

you're all talking s hit

This is a politics thread!

[Guest]

speak, brother, speak . . .

[Scott L. Martinez]

I look forward to gunning you down in flames again.

You flamed yourself by not stepping up to the plate and answering!

Poof!

Is that supposed to offend me?

I bet you enjoy C*** fighting Kallel

Mind you, your rancid little one couldn't stand to attention if it was frozen in a block of ice.

[Guest]

I really dont see a problem with a child being raised by gay parents. Some children have no parents and are orphaned.

But your justifying your point based on a bad situation!
That's not very smart!
You could justify putting kids in the care of child molesters using you logic!

If you go through life with your head in the sand...all you end up being is an arse.

If you actually were intelligent, you'd realise your argument (if you can call it that) is a lot of rubbish - and shut the hell up. People need proof nowadays, it's not the middle ages. If you make a claim you must support it with reliable evidence, otherwise you will crash and burn.

And you have, frequently.

I look forward to gunning you down in flames again.

Where is he wrong in saying it's bad to justify something based on a bad situation, Scott?

[Astral]

It would be better for a child to have two gay loving parents, then two horrible heterosexual parents.

Saying homosexuality is contagious would be retarded as well.

[Scott L. Martinez]

I really dont see a problem with a child being raised by gay parents. Some children have no parents and are orphaned.

But your justifying your point based on a bad situation!
That's not very smart!
You could justify putting kids in the care of child molesters using you logic!

If you go through life with your head in the sand...all you end up being is an arse.

If you actually were intelligent, you'd realise your argument (if you can call it that) is a lot of rubbish - and shut the hell up. People need proof nowadays, it's not the middle ages. If you make a claim you must support it with reliable evidence, otherwise you will crash and burn.

And you have, frequently.

I look forward to gunning you down in flames again.

Where is he wrong in saying it's bad to justify something based on a bad situation, Scott?

Where is he right?

[Scott L. Martinez]

It would be better for a child to have two gay loving parents, then two horrible heterosexual parents.

Saying homosexuality is contagious would be retarded as well.

Hear Hear!