Sometimes honesty looks like prejudice. For instance he finds being called a fat b***** as bad as being called a black b*****. While shockingly honest for a politician, and very non-politically-correct (It should be a "b***** of colour", or "racially challenged b*****"), it's pretty much common sense to me that a b***** is a b***** is a b***** whatever his or her genetic origins.
Sometimes honesty looks like prejudice. For instance he finds being called a fat b***** as bad as being called a black b*****. While shockingly honest for a politician, and very non-politically-correct (It should be a "b***** of colour", or "racially challenged b*****"), it's pretty much common sense to me that a b***** is a b***** is a b***** whatever his or her genetic origins.
Sometimes honesty looks like prejudice. For instance he finds being called a fat b***** as bad as being called a black b*****. While shockingly honest for a politician, and very non-politically-correct (It should be a "b***** of colour", or "racially challenged b*****"), it's pretty much common sense to me that a b***** is a b***** is a b***** whatever his or her genetic origins.
Sometimes honesty looks like prejudice. For instance he finds being called a fat b***** as bad as being called a black b*****. While shockingly honest for a politician, and very non-politically-correct (It should be a "b***** of colour", or "racially challenged b*****"), it's pretty much common sense to me that a b***** is a b***** is a b***** whatever his or her genetic origins.
Sometimes honesty looks like prejudice. For instance he finds being called a fat b***** as bad as being called a black b*****. While shockingly honest for a politician, and very non-politically-correct (It should be a "b***** of colour", or "racially challenged b*****"), it's pretty much common sense to me that a b***** is a b***** is a b***** whatever his or her genetic origins.
Sometimes honesty looks like prejudice. For instance he finds being called a fat b***** as bad as being called a black b*****. While shockingly honest for a politician, and very non-politically-correct (It should be a "b***** of colour", or "racially challenged b*****"), it's pretty much common sense to me that a b***** is a b***** is a b***** whatever his or her genetic origins.
Christ. What a moron.
It was tongue in cheek. Idiot.
But it wasn't funny.
Race relations are supposed to be funny?
Nooo... but you tried to make them funny. Unsuccessfully, I might add.
Sometimes honesty looks like prejudice. For instance he finds being called a fat b***** as bad as being called a black b*****. While shockingly honest for a politician, and very non-politically-correct (It should be a "b***** of colour", or "racially challenged b*****"), it's pretty much common sense to me that a b***** is a b***** is a b***** whatever his or her genetic origins.
Christ. What a moron.
It was tongue in cheek. Idiot.
But it wasn't funny.
Race relations are supposed to be funny?
Nooo... but you tried to make them funny. Unsuccessfully, I might add.
I believe the word I would choose is satire. Wikipedia has plenty of examples in it's definition of satire, enough for even the most dull to understand the concept.
You have to be funny to be a satirist. Go back to sleep.
Satire is not humour, or even humourous. It is also often mistaken for the author agreeing with the subject, when the opposite is true. Of course the British have banned the Ren and Stimpy show, so you wouldn't have even low quality satire as part of your culture. High quality satire, such as that of Twain or Franklin would be unintelligible. You can comfort yourself that there is little freedom of speech in socialism, in comparison to liberal democracies, therefore you will never have to be challenged.
Site Map
FAQ
Usergroups
Search
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Register
My Profile Space
