You've got to pity an adult man who likes to take a dump in a nappy.
Why? What's your rationale?
It speaks for itself.
Perhaps he want's mummy to come and say "potty time".
I would propose that "it" does not speak for "itself". Your speculation may be correct, it may not be so, but it is what it is......speculation, confirmed by the inclusion of the word "perhaps".
You have not stated your rationale, to support your statement. Do you have one? If you don't, then your statement is invalid.
You've got to pity an adult man who likes to take a dump in a nappy.
Why? What's your rationale?
It speaks for itself.
Perhaps he want's mummy to come and say "potty time".
I would propose that "it" does not speak for "itself". Your speculation may be correct, it may not be so, but it is what it is......speculation, confirmed by the inclusion of the word "perhaps".
You have not stated your rationale, to support your statement. Do you have one? If you don't, then your statement is invalid.
So you think that I have nothing better to do with my life than read through 147 pages, just to seek your rationale? Frankly, I'm not going to do that.
What disturbs me, is/are those, such as yourself, who would seek to subjugate and humiliate other's for an apparently harmless fetish.
If some people like wearing and wetting/pooing nappies, so what? I would suggest that life would be so boring if we were all the same....
IMHO, it's people like you who are the real problem, because you pontificate about matters of which you know little, and do not have the intelligence to accept other good people for what they are. Perhaps because you are restricted by your own psychological straight-jacket?....I appreciate that I speculate, but, then, why shouldn't I?
So you think that I have nothing better to do with my life than read through 147 pages, just to seek your rationale? Frankly, I'm not going to do that.
What disturbs me, is/are those, such as yourself, who would seek to subjugate and humiliate other's for an apparently harmless fetish.
If some people like wearing and wetting/pooing nappies, so what? I would suggest that life would be so boring if we were all the same....
IMHO, it's people like you who are the real problem, because you pontificate about matters of which you know little, and do not have the intelligence to accept other good people for what they are. Perhaps because you are restricted by your own psychological straight-jacket?....I appreciate that I speculate, but, then, why shouldn't I?
My rationale was stated in the last few posts or so I've made.
There is nothing harmless about a mother having a fetish for nappies and fabricating illness in her child (MSbP) because she wants them to wear nappies. Kids are taken away from such mothers.
As always, it seems, you have missed the point, maybe because you are wrapped-up in your own cocoon of virtual and imaginary smugness?
There are many things which are very wrong in our society, but my question was about your rationale, which you have still not stated. Why is it so wrong, in your opinion, for people to derive pleasure from a harmless fetish?
As always, it seems, you have missed the point, maybe because you are wrapped-up in your own cocoon of virtual and imaginary smugness?
There are many things which are very wrong in our society, but my question was about your rationale, which you have still not stated. Why is it so wrong, in your opinion, for people to derive pleasure from a harmless fetish?
But it's not. It is a psychological disorder on the DSM.
But it's not. It is a psychological disorder on the DSM.
Twaddle! What are you going-on about: "But it's not.", you say. Not what? You make no sense whatsoever (as always!). Please, can you, at least, have the decency to reply in full sentences, and state that which you mean, instead of assuming that we are all psychic.
You are quite correct in your assertion that "it" is a listed psychological disorder within DSM., (Presumably, by "it", you mean a nappy-fetish?).
So what? Why does such a listing mean that "it" is anyway harmful to anyone? Why should a DSM listing deprive people of their human rights, which includes the right to wear and use nappies, should they so wish? I would suggest that it does not do so, in any way, shape or form.
I would also suggest that your stated theories on "Munchausen by Proxy" are seriously flawed in this connection. There may be parents who force their children into nappies, for their own gain, and, IMHO, this is abhorrent, although others might disagree, of course. But you must also realise that there are some children who enjoy wearing and using nappies, for whatever reason. That is the very nature of variety within the human sphere of diversity.
I know that you are a growing person, as are we all, but you have much to learn. The more that you learn, the more you will realise how much you do not know, or understand. This is part of the "growing-up" process.
Site Map
FAQ
Usergroups
Search
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Register
My Profile Space
