Moderator: Silent One
. wrote:I started to get stretch marks when I was about 14 or 15. They first came on my stomach as I put on alot of weight in a short space of time and I developed quite a large belly...
I then got them on my hips, thighs, breasts, lower back... then eventually on my triceps (right at the top near the armpit).
I had probably gained near on 3 stone in a short while. But I kept at that weight for a few years. Last year I went on a diet and managed to lose around 3 stones... but 6 months ago I fell off the wagon and I've managed to put back on that 3 stones. I've noticed the areas are getting sore where my current stretch marks are... I'd say mainly the ones on my triceps... and more my left arm.
Now I am guessing this is because I've put on a few stone in a short time and I am now getting new/more stretch marks because of it!
I am moisturising the skin, I also have retin-a prescribed by the doctor.
I am back on my diet and going back to the gym. I am hoping these "new" stretch marks will stop developing... and hopefully they will look less "noticeable" than what they do now.
I have alot of stretch marks, and they've been there for about 8 years now... I really do HATE them and they get me down alot... but in a way I have learnt to live with them. I just don't think I could handle getting new ones... I have enough already.
The ones on my stomach, legs... breasts etc I can hide. But the ones at the top/back of my arms are more difficult... unless I wear long sleeved clothes all the time.
Has anyone else experienced weight loss and then saw any kind of improvement in the way their stretch marks look?
. wrote:
Weight loss will never make stretch marks disappear.
. wrote:Bohemus wrote:Well Johnny9, only time will show if needling is effective and becomes number one tretment for....who knows what.. It will not hurt you to keep rolling and sprinkling with potions but I suggest you add few drops of common sense.
MD from TN
Bohemus could you try and be a little more patronising next time. I find you extremely naive and arrogant and you continue to fail to understand the situation some of us are in here. If by common sense you mean go and blow disproportionate amounts of money at machines which dont deliver i believe you've been going to the wrong type of medical congresses my friend.
There are no cures. For this reason we have to do our own research and experiment. I found your last comment to johnny9 extremeley rude. What do you suggest we do? I did my first needling procedure 2 days ago using 1.5mm roller and i believe i have seen improvement from just this one treatment. Your comment about "common sense" is extremely patronising to all those on this forum performing needling. I would like you to share with us all on here what you think we should do, since were all so incompetent with our suggestions.
Bohemus wrote:Hello Guast,
I didn't mean to offend anyone at all. My point is rather simple. There are many claims made in this industry, "the most effective", "laboratory tested", "physician approved" etc. But what does it mean when all is not regulated? You can mix several substances in your bathroom and legally claim that it was laboratory tested. You can add some sunscreen to peanut oil and legally sell the mixture as the best "anti-wrinkle" cream. It is legal, at least in US.
The question is what really works, how do you establish the effectiveness of any cream or laser technique? Only by well designed study that you should review with a critical eye.
Do I have stretch marks? No. Do I care? Yes, I do. This is one of the most disappointing areas in aesthetic medicine that has been approached for some time without real success.
It is our hope that ActiveFX/Deep FX will make a significant difference. It is too early to say although the preliminary data suggest significant improvement. I have 6 patients treated with IPL immediately followed by Active FX with high frequency. There is a definite improvement yet the group is so small that the validity can not be claimed.
But, the design of these treatments is based on unquestionable effect of CO2 laser on collagen production in treated skin. The hope is to achieve this effect within a stretch mark.
Other laser treatments? So far no significant gains have been made.
Other treatments? I don't know of any that has an objective and measurable effect.
So, should you try other methods? Sure! Can you claim any of them to be effective? Of course you can. Does it work? That's a different story.
Best to All!
MD in TN
I hate to say it but you do have a patronising tone at times, we may not be experts but we are people trying to help themselves because, as you yourself say, it is a disappointing area of research. Hopefully the medical community will redress this one day and a cure will be found.
J
. wrote:To those of you who are using dermarollers... I just got mine (a 1.0) and tried it out for just a few minutes. It doesn't feel like it is penetrating the skin at all. Should I push harder? I'm using it on my abdomen, butt and thighs. After I expected pinpricks of blood but there was nothing.
Any advice?
Shoo
Rez wrote:I agree with the guest. Perhaps the improvement in your brother's skin coincided with weight loss. However, I sincerely doubt that the weight loss itself was the cause of improvement. Most obese people notice their stretch marks for the very first time after losing weight, even thought they might have had them for years beforehand. Their stretch marks are no longer stretched as tightly and therefore look more obvious.
If you don't beleive me, try this experiment at home: Stand in a postion where your stretch marks are lit from the side (e.g. next to low lying window). Position a mirror directly in front of you. You will notice that the marks look particularly obvious and indented in this lighting. Now pull on the skin in a direction PERPENDICULAR to the length of the marks to simulate the effect of weight gain in the area. What happens? Your stretch marks should look significantly better and less indented.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest