The Colonel wrote:I'm not repeating myself. Read Sodium Pentothols conclusions. You find my position there.
You are lying again. Sodium Pentothol did not conclude anything, he merely pointed out that some women with Munchausen’s Syndrome by Proxy claimed that their child was disabled. It was you who then jumped to the conclusion that McMum must have MSbP, without any corroborative evidence. It’s all in the thread. This is as ludicrous as concluding that because some convicted murderers have been army officers, that all army officers must be murderers. Are you a convicted murderer, Colonel? You are either a malicious liar or a total dimwit to reach the conclusion that you did, which is it?
I don't care about religion. Religion is a choice. Religion IS divisive, hateful, intolerant and so on, it has caused more trouble, war and death than any other man made thing. I have a right to hate religion and when I have fought against religious nutters in various countries - I am in a greater position to know what I am talking about than you.
Yet again, just because SOME religious bigots have been hateful and intolerant, one cannot conclude that ALL religious people are hateful and intolerant.
I see no logical difference in the comments “Most priests are paedophiles” and "God exists. I have seen and spoken to YHWH" (Swee's comment). Both are absudities. If no-one will challenge statements like hers - why challenge mine?
There is a big difference. Swee may well believe that God exists and that she has spoken to YHWH, but you are perfectly aware that your statement that “Most priests are paedophiles” is a lie, yet you still say it.
I do not believe I have made any errors in my HIV percentages whatsoever. Indicate which you are talking about and what you claim to be wrong with them.
You wrote:-
UK Population : 60 Million
UK Gay population: 6 Million
UK gay HIV/AIDS population: 26,000
Means: 0.004% of the gay population of the UK has HIV/AIDS.
There were a number of other instances, where you showed your apparent total lack of understanding of percentages.
Britain does have 1817 combat aircraft to be exact. If you'd like a list - I'll give you one!
Don’t bother because I know exactly where you got your list from. I also know that you included:-
The entire aircraft inventory of the Royal Air Force, the Fleet Air Arm and the Army Air Corps, regardless of whether they are combat aircraft or not.
Aircraft of the . Test Pilot’s School.
The RAF Battle of Britain Memorial Flight.
The Royal Navy Historic Flight.
The Army Historic Aircraft Flight.
You clearly have no conception of the meaning of the term ‘combat aircraft’.
My motive for coming here was as a father who has had experience of changing nappies. After reading here time and time again, I knew something just wasn't right. Consequently, I questioned it, and was attacked from all sides for doing so. If it was an innocent thread, why the flame attacks when someone said "hang on a minute"?
You asked whether mothers had sought medical advice, but when you had received no answer after a mere three hours or so, you waded in with accusations that they had not done so. When McMum explained to you that she had indeed consulted the medical profession concerning her son’s condition, you told her that the NHS could not be trusted and that she was not a good mother, as she had not gone to the private sector. You didn’t even know that she had not gone private. She later confirmed that she had. Let’s face it Colonel, you came to this thread with the intention of causing trouble and getting it closed down to satisfy your megalomaniac ego.
You can believe what you like. Plenty here saw McMum for what see was.
You have a vivid imagination, or you are a liar (most likely the latter). Almost all of the regular posters on this thread saw YOU for the troublemaker and liar that you were. Only your cronies (alter egos) believed the lies that you were concocting about McMum. It’s all in the thread.
I am still waiting for your proof concerning the allegations you have made against McMum.
