Major Grumbles wrote:Cambridge wrote: Okay, so who should raise the children of the human race? Heterosexuals, 50% of whom get a divorce and abandon their children?
It doesn't matter - as long as it is not poofs and dykes going to a bring and buy sale picking which kid they want.
Cambridge wrote: Raising children has nothing to do with genitalia, and if it does, report it the pedophilia police…I don’t want that guy anywhere near my kids.
Is it not? It doesn't matter how often you lie on top of your boyfriend, no child is going to appear in nine months time. No morals, no standards - let's tip our man concrete into a safe hole, unless it's unbagged and we fancy the Edinburgh flu!
Cambridge wrote: Are you saying the hetero fuckwits who marry and divorce are more capable of raising children? I would say it depends on the person, and his or her willingness/propensity to accept responsibility. It has nothing to do with gender.
Not at all. Heterosexuals who are left holding the baby do as good a job as they possibley can. Poofters can not do that because kids get ripped up for toilet paper when two screaming queens come to parents night. It's just not acceptable. As I've said before - Adam and Eve - not Adam and Steve!!
Cambridge wrote: You marginalize this as if it is of no consequence. Wrong! It is of great consequence. I know many gay couples who could do better.
From the beginning of recorded time until possibley the mid fifties, what you had was what you had and you just had to work with it. Along came the feminist movement, saying we are not putting up with this pish anymore, you're history, catch you later, I can do a better job on my own. Gay couples can do better - so they say - it's a nice thought!
Cambridge wrote: You think just because they S*** out a kid in order to collect a welfare check they are better prepared to raise a child? You are delusional.
Obviously you do have your prospective pram pushers who are as thick as mince and have no better aspirations other than to go Y-shaped and get a welfare cheque. However, the majority of decent minded women, aspire all the time for a good stable, substantial home to bring their kids up in. These women, because they have been tagged are still a good catch.
Cambridge wrote: Well, let’s take it full cycle. Women belong bare-foot and pregnant, and in the kitchen, fetching their husbands and male children (the real producers here) meals and support. And, African-Americans can only work in the cotton fields and they are only good for jazz and sports. And Asians should all be given calculators, cause they are quick and sneaky.
On your comments about Asians and African-Americans - this kind of talk shows up your true colurs, certainly not mine. As for women, barefooted and pregnant in the kitchen, once pregnancy is over, what is the big deal about picking up their career where they left off? I have no problem with that.
Cambridge rather than looking at life through an extra strong condom just before you push it up your boyfriend's arse, I say once again -
It's Adam & Eve not Adam & Steve!!
Where is that little Greek man tonight?
