Mike,
It would be very easy for me to get angry at this narrow minded attitude

and I can only assume you've never even met a transsexual (at least, not knowingly), let alone take the chance to talk to one indepth what the real anguish of the condition is like?
I live not too far from Brighton, a quite large gay and transgender community, and have to come to know several, from cross-dressers to post-op TSs. So I like to think I'm speaking from a slightly more enlightened viewpoint about the subject. I hadn't really considered the subject too much until some years back when a pen-pal came out to me, and confessed she was a post-op, and had been since about 19. So I read up to find out what exactly she meant (she was a French-Canadian, so I also had to translate a little) when she went into somewhat graphic detail about the operation.
mikenothing wrote:first of all, it isnt a woman, its a man, not a man properly, because its mentally ill, but technically a man
Genetically I'd agree. But genetics is also responsible for many other defects - do you deny people the opportunity to have treatment or surgery to correct those?
mikenothing wrote:u will notice how it is invariably men who have sex changes, men who have fetishes, men who carry out sexual offences, this is because some men cant get laid, and have to resort to abnormal methods in order to get their kicks, nadia is one one of these

If you had the chance to hear my penpal, probably crying as she wrote it, relate to how sex is in many ways a complete
turn-off to true TSs, because the physical difference (to them) just causes too much anguish.
I can't speak for Nadia - I don't watch '
Big Brother' - but others have talked about her at work.
mikenothing wrote:i have had a few discussions with ppl about nadia, they usually say fairly idiotic things like shes a woman, shes so brave, shes so funny, i feel sorry for these people
And holding up transsexually as a 'deception' isn't an idiotic viewpoint - tell me, what side of the perfection line are you that you can be 100% honest in everything
you do?
mikenothing wrote:argument 1 : she hasnt got a penis / has got a vagina - no, incorrect, if my penis were to be severed in a freak accident, it would make me a man who had his penis severed in a freak accident, not a woman, also, it does not have a vagina, it has some piece of skin mashed up and sewn to resemble a vagina, it is not a vagina
argument 2 : she has
breast implants - no, this is no reason, if i were to have pectoral implants, am i now a woman ? no i am not i am a man who has bags of silicone in my chest, same as nadia
It's the lesser of two evils - mental anguish vs physical imperfection. A post-op body is never going to be the exact same as a born womens admittedly, but I ask again, are you going to ask this question of people who have other defects, and have surgery to correct them?
mikenothing wrote:someone also tried to argue with me that it was different because nadia thought she was a woman, this may well be so, but it does not make it a woman, some people think they are cows, it doesnt make them a cow, some people think they are the son of god, it doesnt make them the son of god
I did read that there could be (the research was still in early stages because it was difficult to get samples of TSs who were pre-hormone replacement) a physical reason for this - it was something to do with an area of the the brain (it was some years ago but I think the hippocampus?) which has a marked difference in size between men and women, and TSs were more like womens than men.
mikenothing wrote:it is a man who has had his penis removed, and has silicone bags in his chest, thats all it has no womb, no ovaries, no hips, an adams apple, a jaw a WWF wrestler could be proud of, it has a prostate, its a man
for the most part, you are born male, or born female, it is written in genetic code in every cell of your body
Well again there's a bit of sloppy thinking here - nice to know you've done your research like a nice little ignoramous yourself - the cause of genetic difference is actually triggered
hormonally in the womb. The default sex is female - everyone is XX chromosomes at egg stage, so by default everyone was a girl originally (how's that for 'girl power'!) - and while I'm sure a stud like yourself would like to think that it's your overpowering 'maleness' of your sperms that 'make a man a man' at impregnation stage, it's nothing of the sort. The fertilised egg undergoes a kind of 'hormonal wash' which then triggers the genetic development. And it isn't a matter of just 'black' and 'white' - you're either a man or a woman. Gender difference, so many other genetic differences, is a scale of grey - points on a line between extremes if you like - and I'm sure a child born of one white parent and one coloured parent would love having to be told by someone like you - 'you're either one or the other', rather than perhaps embracing both as something special.
Such barrier building - the age old 'them or us' attitude - is something I'd like to break down in any and every walk of life. Welcome back to the old school, Mike.
mikenothing wrote:nadia is an advert for sexual deviancy, lies and deception, not to mention that it is extremely annoying, loud, common, has no standards, no intelligence to speak of, cheap and nasty
yet it would seem this man with tits is being embraced by the general public a some kind of an icon
an icon for deception and lies, i think this is wrong

Sounds to me like you have a problem with Nadia herself, rather than just TSs. Oh, and I hate all men for being so narrow-minded t****. No, wait a second, it's
you I have the problem with - some men are actually quite genuine, sensitive and thoughtful. You're not a typical example? Oh, my mistake...
