|
|
| In the future, will men take their wife's name in order to symbolize who is in charge of the family? |
| YES |
|
33% |
[ 1 ] |
| NO |
|
66% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 3 |
|
| Author |
Message |
jlynn You Go Girl (100+ Posts)

Joined: 20 Jun 2005 Posts: 103 Location: new orleans
|
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2005 11:10 pm Post subject: taking wife's name |
|
|
| What do you think of the groom taking the bride's last name, instead of vice versa? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kroberts Hello. I am New! Talk to Me
Joined: 13 Sep 2005 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Good question, and obviously a topic you are interested in, please join us in discussing it at [edit] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sugar FemaleFirst Senior Member (500+ Posts)

Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 946 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I must admit, I've never even considered this. I see no problem with a man taking his wife's name. Her name might be famous or sound really nice, and his name might be just horrid. Or maybe he just wants to let her know how much he loves her and is committed to her.
I'm definitely taking my fiance's name when we get married. I love his last name, and I would be proud to have it. I'm also happy that my signature won't change that much and that my initials will stay the same--H.R.H. (I just like the way it looks like Her Royal Highness...shhhhh, don't tell anybody... ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The-Prophet FemaleFirst Guru

Joined: 08 Jul 2005 Posts: 7086 Location: The Middle Of France
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok sugar we won't tell  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sugar FemaleFirst Senior Member (500+ Posts)

Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 946 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, Prophet. What a pal! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The-Prophet FemaleFirst Guru

Joined: 08 Jul 2005 Posts: 7086 Location: The Middle Of France
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you know taking a girls surname might be something i'd do, i don't really like mine tbh and its just a name  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sugar FemaleFirst Senior Member (500+ Posts)

Joined: 27 May 2005 Posts: 946 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Good on you, Prophet! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trixie Guest
|
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I don't see a problem, especially if the wife's surname is nicer!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 2:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Trixie wrote: |
| I don't see a problem, especially if the wife's surname is nicer!! |
Ditto.
Although I don't think it should have to be compulsory like it used to be for the woman. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
selfconcious FemaleFirst Chatter (200+ Posts)
Joined: 15 Feb 2006 Posts: 244
|
Posted: Sun May 14, 2006 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| my sister is wth a guy and they are planning to get amrried te guy wants 2 t8 my sister name as he hates his family also so that when they haave kids hteir kids and my sisters kids froma previous relatioship wll all have the same surname |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|